I’m studying abroad with UNC’s Honors
Semester in London program. The first week has been filled with a dizzying
array of sights and sounds, top among them shows at the National Theater and
West End, trips to the Tate Modern and Buckingham Palace to watch the changing
of the guard, camping out at the London Eye – one of the largest observation
wheels in the world – to take part in a street artist’s endeavor to compile
different viewers’
photographs of the capital – and, of course, taking that all-too-touristy
photograph with the red telephone booth and Big Ben.
While studying abroad, I’m taking a course
in "Contemporary British Art," which takes us to many of London’s
most distinguished art galleries and museums. First stop: The National Portrait
Gallery to become one of the first to see Kate Middleton’s infamous portrait
after its unveiling earlier this month.
![]() |
You can't get a more touristy photo than this! Kate would have done well if her painter was as good as my photographer/ friend, Liz Hawryluk! |
While I thoroughly enjoy art
galleries, I tend to skip over the portraits, preferring scenes that tell a
story, that show interaction between people, creatures and places. Not just a
posed and composed – often stiff – depiction of a person I’ve never met. But
when I heard that we’d be touring the National Portrait Gallery and would have
the opportunity to view Kate Middleton’s newly unveiled portrait, I was
thrilled. Here was the opportunity to see an artistic rendering of someone whom I’ve actually seen before
in real life. I’ve heard crazy stories about her – like how she always wears
the same pair of shoes – and I’ve enjoyed the many photographs of her
extravagant royal wedding. Plus, we all know that Kate stole the crème de la
crème of the royal family. I’d take William over Harry any day of the week.
A brisk walk from Winston House
(Carolina's own London hub for study and research abroad) to the National Portrait Gallery soon brought us
face-to-face with Kate. Only it wasn’t Kate. At least not as I know her. She
was hardly recognizable! If I hadn’t been told, “This is the portrait of Kate
Middleton that you’ve heard so much about,” I’d have passed right by in search
of it. The critics are right: In the portrait she appears older than she
actually is, almost approaching middle-aged, when in fact she’s only 31.
Apparently she approved of the portrait before it went on display. I think she
needs glasses. The portrait depicted her with pursed lips and bags under her
eyes. The only good aspect of the portrait was perfectly fluffed hair – bigger
and better than even stardom will allow. I’m not sure what she was wearing, but
I’m pretty sure that the drab blue shirt was a figment of Paul Emsley’s (the
painter’s) imagination. Apparently, Kate only sat for two sittings and the
artist modeled the rest from photographs. Not sure where he got the photos, but
I’ve certainly never seen them.
Nearby was a portrait that really
put Kate’s to shame. In a simple frame was a small portrait of Corporal Johnson
Beharry, a soldier who served twice in Iraq and earned the Victoria Cross, the
highest honor in the British military. Twice he saved his army vehicle of men
from an onslaught of fire, the second time himself suffering from
life-threatening injuries and still managing to drive his men to safety before
losing consciousness. Beharry became the first living recipient of the Victoria
Cross in more than 30 years, but the honor came at a high cost: serious brain
injuries, which, in his own words, make him feel as if ants are crawling inside
his head. The portrait – truncated and compressed – speaks volumes to Beharry’s
persona and circumstances. The small proportions and simple framing of
Beharry’s portrait are in stark contrast to that of Kate’s, but while Kate’s
portrait tells the viewer nothing about her, just looking at Beharry, I felt as
if I knew him and maybe even understood (a little bit) what he still goes
through today. The narrow portrait focused my eyes on Beharry, calling
attention to the scars cutting across his hair and the stiff posture of
everything from his shoulders to his hands. With nothing to distract me from
his features, I almost felt as if I, too, had ants crawling around in my brain.
After taking a look at painted
portraiture, we moved on to photograph portraits of the royal family. Again,
many of the girls were reminded of William’s merits over Harry’s. A black and
white portrait of William on his 21st birthday in a tux and white
bowtie, head slightly ducked showed the man within – someone shy and
introspective, a stark contrast to Harry’s “every man” color portrait, also
taken on his 21st birthday, posed by his motorcycle and grinning
widely at the camera. We discussed the merits of black and white and color
photography and why certain choices were made: black and white tends to allude
to permanence, while color can add interest and make the viewers feel as if
they, too, are present with the subject, and then continued on to the “Taylor
Wessing Photographic Portrait” exhibit.
We passed through a number of fine
portraits, but I was particularly struck by one of Giles Duley titled “Becoming
the Story.” Again, this one has its roots with the War on Terror, this time in
Afghanistan. Duley is a photojournalist who lost both legs and one arm when he
stepped on an IED while documenting humanitarian issues in the war. When he
found out that he’d lost three of his limbs, he remarked that he was glad to
have his right arm because he could still take photographs. For his
self-portrait, Duley propped himself on a black plinth – an allusion to a
famous sculpture that lost limbs to the dustbins of antiquity and now sits in
the Louvre. Head held high and resolute, looking far into the distance, Duley’s
was a portrait filled with hope. Although an amputee, his portrait was not
about disability, but, rather, ability
in the face of
adversity.
From Kate’s new portrait – an
example of everything that portraiture shouldn’t be – to the soul-moving
portraits of those wounded in war and even the light-hearted photographs of the
young princes celebrating a birthday not so significant over in the U.K., I
learned a great deal about the importance of portraiture. The next time I go to
an art museum, I don’t think I’ll so easily pass over the portraits. Even if I
don’t know the subjects – as I didn’t know Duley before seeing his photograph –
I know that, if it is a good portrait, all I have to do is take the time to
look at the portrait, and I’ll meet someone new.
No comments:
Post a Comment